Question 34(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
(Citizenship 02.05 MC)
Which of the following explains why Americans do not have unlimited rights?
O Rights without limits is just another phrase for anarchy or the absence of government.
O People cannot be trusted to use their rights wisely, so officials must create restrictions.
O Sometimes individual rights conflict with the rights of others or threaten public safety.
O Early leaders of the country never intended for the rights to apply to all of the people.

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: O Sometimes individual rights conflict with the rights of others or threaten public safety.

Explanation:

Answer 2

The reason why Americans do not have unlimited rights is because Sometimes individual rights conflict with the rights of others or threaten public safety.

What is the danger of unlimited rights?

When people have unlimited rights, it is sure to clash with the rights of others because humans have different values.

For instance, a racist cannot be allowed to exercise their rights fully in a free world. For this reason, Americans cannot have unlimited rights.

Find out more on unlimited governance at https://brainly.com/question/891458.

#SPJ2


Related Questions

What essential conditions are necessary for a combustion reaction (fire triangle)?
please write a full sentence or report you.

Answers

The three essential conditions necessary for a combustion reaction, or the fire triangle, are heat, fuel, and oxygen.

What is Combustions?

Combustion, also known as burning, is a chemical reaction in which a substance reacts quickly with oxygen to release heat and light. This process is often accompanied by a flame and is an important part of many natural and human-made processes, including combustion engines, cooking, and wildfires.

The fire triangle is a model used to explain the three essential conditions that are required for a fire to start and continue burning: fuel, heat, and oxygen. In other words, in order for a combustion reaction to occur, there must be a fuel source (such as wood, gasoline, or paper).

Learn more about Combustions from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/24113573

#SPJ1

type of advance medical directive does the AMA recommend? Living will or Durable power of attorney
‏I need a definitive answer to this question, please

Answers

Answer:

C) Durable power of attorney

Explanation:

A Power of Attorney is a legal document that appoints an “Agent” to represent you and handle specific issues for you. Depending upon the terms of the Power of Attorney, your Agent could be authorized to make financial and health care decisions on your behalf.

The ONLY type of mistake that can be used as a defense is a mistake of , A) law ,B) fact C)police procedure D) identity​

Answers

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

I've learned this before and I know its fact

Answer:

The Criminal Defense of Mistake

In many situations, a criminal defendant may wish to argue that he or she never intended to commit a crime and that the criminal act that occurred was a result of a mistake of facts regarding the circumstances of the crime or a misunderstanding concerning the law at the time. Such mistakes of fact can be applied to a variety of criminal activities, but mistakes of law are only rarely allowed as full defenses to criminal conduct.

Mistakes of Fact

Mistakes of fact arise when a criminal defendant misunderstood some fact that negates an element of the crime. For instance, if an individual is charged with larceny but believed that the property he took was rightfully his, this misunderstanding negates any intent to deprive another of the property. One important qualification, however, is that this mistake of fact must be honest and reasonable. Thus, a defendant cannot later claim that he or she was mistaken when he or she actually knew the situation. Likewise, the mistake must be one that would appear reasonable to a judge or jury. If the same individual was repeatedly told that the property was not his, and he could not take it, it would no longer be reasonable for him to mistakenly have believed that he could rightfully take the property.

Mistake of Law

Mistake of law is a defense that the criminal defendant misunderstood or was ignorant of the law as it existed at the time. The onus is generally placed on individuals to be aware of the laws of their state or community, and thus this defense only applies in very limited circumstances. For example, while a defendant will not be able to claim that he was not aware that murder was a crime, he may be able to argue that he was not aware of some obscure traffic law.

Specifically, mistake of law can be used as a defense in four limited circumstances:

When the law has not been published;

When the defendant relied upon a law or statute that was later overturned or deemed unconstitutional;

When the defendant relied upon a judicial decision that was later overruled; or

When the defendant relied upon an interpretation by an applicable official.

Additionally, the defendant’s reliance on any of these sources must have been reasonable, much like mistake of fact. Thus, a defendant cannot claim that he was relying on a case from 200 years ago when it is apparent that there have been subsequent developments in the law.

It is also important to note that, while reliance on an interpretation of an official may include judges or federal or state agencies, it does not include reliance on the statements of a private attorney. It is therefore important to ensure that any attorney from whom you obtain advice is knowledgeable and trustworthy.

Mistake and Strict Liability

Mistake is not a defense to a strict liability offense. For example, Raquel lives in a jurisdiction in which the sale of alcohol to minors is a strict liability offense. She does her best to check identification whenever selling alcohol at her store. Doug, age 17, presents Raquel with a convincing fake I.D. and otherwise appears to be over 21. If Raquel sells Doug alcohol, she could be guilty of selling alcohol to a minor, even though she reasonably and honestly believed that Doug was old enough to purchase it.

1. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in ______ but not ratified until _____.​

Answers

Answer:

The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, the first constitution of the United States, on November 15, 1777. However, ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1, 1781

Explanation:

Besides conducting a proper investigation and taking proper disciplinary action against a confirmed harasser, manage-
ment has a legal responsibility to:
O A. Inform all employees of the results of the investigation
O B. Ensure the victim receives monetary compensation for damages
O C. Report the results of the investigation to the police
O D. Aid the victim in minimizing or reversing the effects of the harassment​

Answers

Answer:A

Explanation:

Besides conducting a proper investigation and taking proper disciplinary action against a confirmed harasser, management has a legal responsibility to inform all employees of the results of the investigation. Thus, the correct option is (A).

When employers become aware of complaints of various forms of harassment, it is their responsibility to conduct a fast, impartial, and complete inquiry.

Investigators should gather precise, factual evidence of the circumstances and substance of any complaints or protests made by the person alleging harassment.

This will entail taking disciplinary action against the accused harasser and informing the complainant of the outcome.

Therefore, the correct option is "A".

To know more about the investigation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1191670

#SPJ2

ang bakuna ng mga bata tulad ng polio at iba pa ay libre sa health center? tama. .o. mali.​

Answers

Answer:

TAMA

Explanation:

Answer:

TAMA

Explanation:

hope it helps you have a good day keep smiling be happy stay safe ☺️

how can class evidence become individual evidence.

Answers

Answer:

Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source. The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic.

Explanation:

I hope it helps you

There are nine goals that a perpetrator may seek in a courthouse security breach. which is the most serious or impactful? Which is the least serious and impactful?​

Answers

Abusing power and control.

Explanation:

The Bureau of Consumer Protection is one part of the Federal Trade Commission. How do regulatory agencies like these impact consumers? How do they affect businesses?


Any incorrect or silly answers will not be accepted, this isn't a joke

Answers

Answer: The bureau of consumer protection is an organization that protects the rights of consumers.

Explanation:

The bureau of consumer protection collects complaints from consumers. It conducts investigations on the sale and purchase of goods or services and fraudulent and unfair business practices.

The bureau of consumer protection is a regulatory agency, which develops the rules to maintain the fair marketplace by educating the consumers. The unethical business practices in which consumers are being cheated are sued by the bureau.

hich latent print detection technique is used to detect prints on a non-porous surface?
A.
silver nitrate
B.
iodine fuming
C.
ninhydrin
D.
superglue fuming

D is the right answer got it right!

Answers

The answer is Superglue fuming

Yelling fire in a theatre when there is no fire presents which of the following?
A.
Warning
B.
Dilemma
Clear and present danger
OD. Fighting word

Answers

The correct answer is letter choice b

Describe the role conflict that exists for treatment professionals.

Answers

In the professional area, these are a few role conflicts that exist:

Unclear Job Expectations.Poor Communication.Toxic Work Environment.

What is the concept of role conflict?

Job conflict happens when employees are given multiple, incompatible roles at once or when their role overlaps with that of another employee or workgroup. A worker is more likely to experience stress at work if there is more role conflict.

A role conflict typically arises when someone is pulled in several different ways as they attempt to respond to the numerous statuses they have. The most frequent role conflict is between a person's commitments at work and at home, or between professional and personal responsibilities.

Learn more about role conflict, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13603130

#SPJ1

1. Explain the relationship between the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and the Sixth Amendment.

2. Do you think the Criminal Justice System does a good job at protecting the defendant's Sixth Amendment Right? Why or why not? Give evidence to support your answer.

Answers

The Speedy Trial Act of 74' states that a trial shall not be delayed more than 100 days, the Sixth Amendment states that you have the right to a speedy trial, they are basically the same thing the 74' Speedy Trial Act just puts a number to the Amendment.

The Criminal Justice system does a terrible job at providing speedy trials, some suspects spend years waiting for their trial, and get partial or biased jury members. The Criminal Justice system in general needs reformed but especially when it comes to speedy trials.

which of the following tools of monetary policy has not been used since 1992? A)paying interest on excess reserves
B)the reserve ratio
C)open-market operations
D)the federal funds rate

Answers

The tool of monetary policy that has not been used since 1992 is the reserve ratio. The reserve ratio is the percentage of deposits that banks and other financial institutions are required to keep in reserve as cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank.

This tool has not been used since 1992 because it was deemed to be an ineffective method of controlling the money supply and promoting economic stability.The Federal Reserve System, commonly known as the Fed, is the central bank of the United States. It is responsible for implementing monetary policy, which involves controlling the money supply and interest rates to achieve economic goals such as stable prices, maximum employment, and moderate long-term interest rates.The Fed has several tools at its disposal to implement monetary policy, including open-market operations, the discount rate, and reserve requirements. Open-market operations involve the buying and selling of government securities on the open market to influence the money supply and interest rates. The discount rate is the interest rate at which banks can borrow money from the Fed, and reserve requirements are the percentage of deposits that banks must keep in reserve. Paying interest on excess reserves is also a tool that the Fed can use to influence the money supply and interest rates. However, the reserve ratio has not been used since 1992 because it was deemed to be an ineffective method of controlling the money supply and promoting economic stability.

To know more about monetary policy  , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33708774

#SPJ11

An important duty of the president is
appointing senators.
O addressing ingress.
O creating laws.
O funding the military.

Answers

Creating laws
This is easy boi

Answer:

Addressing Congress

Explanation:

I'm going to guess that there are 4 questions.

The President does not appoint senators, they are elected by the people of a state.

The President does not create laws, that is up to the Legislative Branch of Congress.

The President does not fund the military, Congress funds the military.

The answer here is

B. Addressing Congress.

behavior performed under the guise of police authority that either does not conform to accepted standards of conduct or is not part of normal patrol work is called:

Answers

The behavior performed under the guise of police authority that either does not conform to accepted standards of conduct or is not part of normal patrol work is called police misconduct.

Police misconduct refers to any inappropriate or unlawful actions taken by law enforcement officers while carrying out their duties. It can include various forms of misconduct such as excessive use of force, racial profiling, corruption, false arrests, discriminatory practices, and violations of civil rights.

Instances of police misconduct can erode public trust in law enforcement and have significant social and legal consequences. Efforts are made to address and prevent police misconduct through various means, including internal investigations, civilian oversight boards, policy reforms, and legal accountability measures.

Police departments and jurisdictions often have specific protocols and mechanisms in place to handle complaints and investigate allegations of police misconduct. The goal is to ensure accountability, maintain professional standards, and protect the rights and well-being of individuals within the community.

In summary, behavior performed under the guise of police authority that deviates from accepted standards of conduct or normal patrol work is referred to as police misconduct. It encompasses various forms of inappropriate or unlawful actions by law enforcement officers, and efforts are made to address and prevent such misconduct to maintain public trust and uphold the principles of justice and fairness.

Learn more about misconduct here

https://brainly.com/question/9643279

#SPJ11

An example of innovative thinking is changing an old manufacturing process to save time and money.
True
False

Answers

Based on problem-solving strategy skills, it is true that an example of innovative thinking is changing an old manufacturing process to save time and money.

This is because innovation is a term used to describe the successful use of new ideas to create something better than the existing version.

Innovation usually involves establishing, improving, and executing a new commodity, process or service, to create efficiency, effectiveness, or competitive benefit.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "True."

Learn more about innovation here: https://brainly.com/question/19969274

Select an important Supreme Court case from this module, such as Reno v. ACLU (1997) or Roe v. Wade (1973). Research the case at Oyez or FindLaw Write a brief summary of the facts of the case (in your own words). What was the court’s ruling? Do you agree with the ruling? Why or why not? What did you learn about Supreme Court cases from this exercise? Your paper must be consistent with the most recent edition of APA, Chicago Style, or MLA guidelines (Pick the style you use in your major). Research, engage in critical thinking, and cite and reference all sources used. Follow rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation. Your paper must be at least 250 words.

Answers

BEFORE YOU COPY PASTE THIS, READ IT OVER AND MAKE SURE IT'S CORRECT AND CORRESPONDING WITH WHATEVER YOU'RE ABOUT TO WRITE. PROMISE ME THAT, I don't want you to get a bad grade. and CHANGE IT AROUND. (This is not plagiarized, Good luck.)

Answer:

Roe v. Wade (1973) was a landmark Supreme Court case in the United States that dealt with the issue of abortion. The case originated in Texas, where a woman named Jane Roe (a pseudonym) challenged the state's abortion laws, which criminalized most abortions except those necessary to save the life of the mother.

The Court examined the constitutional right to privacy and whether it extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion. The decision was divided into two parts: the first trimester, the second trimester, and the third trimester of pregnancy.

In a 7-2 decision, the Court ruled that a woman's right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause included the right to choose to have an abortion in the first trimester. The Court held that during the second trimester, the state could regulate abortion to protect the mother's health. However, during the third trimester, the state had a compelling interest in protecting the potentiality of human life and could prohibit abortions except when necessary to save the life or health of the mother.

The ruling in Roe v. Wade has been highly controversial and continues to be the subject of debate in the United States. Supporters argue that it recognizes a woman's right to make decisions regarding her own body and reproductive health, while critics argue that it undermines the rights of the unborn child and should be overturned.

As an AI, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, it's important to note that opinions on Roe v. Wade vary widely, and individuals may agree or disagree with the ruling based on their personal values, religious beliefs, or interpretation of the Constitution.

From this exercise, we can learn that Supreme Court cases have a significant impact on shaping and interpreting laws in the United States. These cases often deal with complex legal and constitutional issues and can have far-reaching consequences for society. It is crucial to understand the facts, arguments, and legal principles involved in such cases in order to form an informed opinion or analysis. Additionally, proper citation and adherence to the guidelines of the chosen citation style, such as APA, Chicago Style, or MLA, are important for maintaining academic integrity and providing accurate references to the sources used.

Explanation:

explain the function of government and the institutions that carry it

Answers

Answer:

The function of government is to provide governance and order to society. And the institutions that carry out this function include the legislative, executive, and judicial, of government.

With reference to the relevant provision of law, discuss whether the death penalty is against human rights.​

Answers

Answer:

The U.S. death penalty system flagrantly violates human rights law. It is often applied in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner without affording vital due process rights. Moreover, methods of execution and death row conditions have been condemned as cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment and even torture.

Explanation:

If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.

Answers

The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.

The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.

They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.

To know more about employment , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17459074

#SPJ4

The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through which of the following means?

A. Stating incorrect facts and observing the subject's reaction.
B. Asking a series of indirect questions.
C. Making the subject feel relaxed and comfortable.
D. Creating a situation in which the subject perceives that they may be in danger.

Answers

Answer:

B. Asking a series of indirect questions.

Explanation:

The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through asking a series of indirect questions.

Option A refers to a technique called deception, where incorrect facts are stated to observe the subject's reaction. Option C refers to building rapport, which can help to establish trust and encourage the subject to share information voluntarily. Option D refers to the use of intimidation or coercion, which is not a recommended or ethical method for obtaining information.

Explain how the prompt below is an example of checks and balances between the three branches of government. “You just got pulled over by a police officer. He writes you a ticket for texting while driving. The only problem is you didn’t have your cellphone at the time, because you lost your phone on vacation with your family the week prior! There is nothing you can do in the moment about receiving the ticket, but... there is something you can do about having to pay the fine. In fact you may be a like to have the ticket removed from your record altogether!” Explain below how checks and balances may save your wallet money and your driving record.

Answers

Answer:Cause they can’t check it and if your doing good it helps

Explanation:

Question 2
What should you leave with a friend or relative before a long outing on the
water?
A
float plan
B
boat registration certificate
С
operator's license
D
insurance policy
As
pport
Submit Answer

Answers

Answer:

A. Float plan

Explanation:

A float plan can be defined as a written statement containing the details about an intended boat trip which is filed with a friend, siblings, or relatives.

Generally, float plan is a collection of details about your boat, number of people on board (crew and passengers), a safety equipment being used, expected or intended destination, and when you expect to get there.

Hence, before a long outing on the water, you should leave a float plan with your friend or relative.

The purpose of having a float plan is to assist the search and rescue personnel in locating victims in the event of a boat accident, mishap or emergency.

In a nutshell, a float plan is a life saving document which is used to locate victims in the shortest possible time during a boat emergency.

you should hve your battery and charging system check?​

Answers

To avoid draining your battery

One of the main benefits of a trade bloc is that member countries:
A. freely share natural resources with each other.
B. can trade with one another more efficiently.
C. can establish trade barriers with other countries.
D. do not have to worry about foreign competition.

Answers

One of the main benefit of a trade bloc is that the member countries can engage into trade among one another in an efficient way.

Option B is correct.

What is trade barrier?

Trade barrier is the limitation being put on the incoming and outgoing of goods and services from or to the country. It depends on the country whether to keep or remove it.

Trade bloc is defined as the contract initiated between the countries in order to increase the trading activities which can be import or export. It can be done when the nations remove the limitations to trade and tariffs. This resulted in free flow of goods and services where import or export has been created. It is a kind of agreement being operated in an independent manner.

Therefore, the explanation written in option B is correct.

Learn more about the trade barrier in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/27863334

#SPJ5

Question 1
__ is important to law enforcement, because police officers have the right to deprive people of their liberty.
A unethical behavior
B Ethical behavior
Misuse of force
D) Use of force

Answers

It will be... b because it makes the most since

In your own words, what do you think the role of a Student Government member is?


(in school) also plz give me a formal explanation

Answers

Explanation:

Student government is a group of students that are charged with managing a wide range of events, activities, programs, policies, and initiatives around the school. Some members are elected by the student body, and others may be appointed by the elected officials to help with specific tasks or areas of interest.

1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?

2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.

Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.

While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.

However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.

In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.

Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:

1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.

2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.

3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.

On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:

1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.

2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.

3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.

mary, a citizen of alaska, has put up a web site about her use of over the counter drugs to lose weight. the web site merely posted information and has no interactive capbalities. sarah, a citizen of indiana, looks at the site on her computer in indiana and without contacting her doctor takes the same over the counter drugs and gets sick. she decides to sue mary. the proper jurisdiction for this case is:

Answers

The proper jurisdiction for this case is "Minimum contacts".

The defendant has engaged in at least a small but significant amount of activity that qualifies as "minimum contacts" in the state where the lawsuit was filed. The "minimum contacts" requirement generally means that a defendant must have a sufficient connection to the state in which a case has been filed for a judge to conclude that the state has the right to exercise power over the defendant. A judge is likely to conclude that "minimum contacts" exist if a company with its headquarters in another state sends mail order catalogs into the state where the suit is filed, does business with paid subscribers, or accepts online orders from customers in the state where the case is filed.

Learn more about "minimum contacts"-

https://brainly.com/question/10260455

#SPJ4

Other Questions
The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803) was important because it granted the Court the power to Approximately how long has the victim been dead if the body temperature is 27C? In 1764 and 1765, Britain raised taxes in the colonies to beef up theBritish budget and to pay for an increased military presence in the colonies. TheStamp Act, for example, taxed all sorts of paper items, including legal documents,newspapers, pamphlets, marriage licenses, and even playing cards. Colonists didn'tappreciate these taxes and insisted that only the colonial legislatures could raise thecolonies' taxes. They argued that they should not suffer from British taxationwithout representation in the British Parliament. Why would the colonists' be soconcerned about the Stamp Act? debbies lemonade stand lost a total of 56 this week.which is the average daily change in the value of debbies lemonade stand if you find an article on the internet that you want to use is behind a paywall, what should you do? 4. Find the volume of the pyramid HALP AND YOU GET CANDY THE PICTURE BELOW IS YOUR KEY TO CANDY (BRAINLIST) ______ assisted General Washington at Valley Forge.a. Bernardo de Galvezb. Benedict Arnoldc. John Burgoyned. Horatio Gatese. Baron Von Steuben 1. Find the minimum rate of change i.e. the smallest directional derivative of f(x,y) = x + In(xy) at (1,1). a. 0 b. - 15 c. 3 d. 2 e. 5 f. None of the above 2 Find /(3,1) -f(0,1), where /(x,y) is a p Comparisons of the amount of time that different species spend sleeping support the observation that A) the cerebellum is over-active in meat-cating species B) herbivores (non-meat-eaters) sleep relatively little C) endorphins block non-REM sleep D) peripheral feedback from leg muscles triggers onset of sleeping How do you say beans in Spanish? What's the most popular way to say it? I was thinking either frijoles or habichuelas but I have no idea! What do most Spanish people say? factorise 6n-10 how do you do it? What is a good estimate for 470% of 40? Explain.470% is equivalent to the decimal nothing, which can be rounded to 6.6.5.5.3.3. So, 470% of 40 is approximately equal to 3 times 403406 times 4646 times 406405 times 405403 times 4345 times 454, which is equal to nothing. So, a good estimate for 470% of 40 is pls hurry Bratko Construction purchased a poured concrete form from Clemente Concrete Forms, Inc. Bratko purchased the concrete form by placing a phone call to Clemente in Madison, Wisconsin. Clemente delivered the concrete form with an invoice stating the terms of the sale required payment within 30 days and a 1 % interest per month finance charge would be charged on accounts over 30 days. When Bratko failed to pay the invoice on time, interest was charged according to this rate.Later, Bratko refused to pay the accumulated interest charge claiming there was not a "meeting of the minds" regarding the finance charge in any conversation prior to the sale. The trial court concluded that the finance charge was in fact an "additional term" added by Clemente when it accepted Bratkos purchase order.Is there a valid contract? What are the legal implications of this "additional term"?Does Bratko owe the interest accrued? Please please someone help me with this question!!! math question !!!! eate an associative PHP array for following items and display them in a HTML table (You must use an appropriate loop for display each rows and take field names as array index)Name : KamalAge : 22Gender : MaleTown : KottawaCounty : Sri LankaColour : RedPrice : Rs.355.40Height : 5.3Registered date : 2016-05-20Insert time : 13:30:35 per company policy tools over 1000 are capitalized. whats the correct entry to record a tool purchase of 500? Joel takes out a loan with a stated rate of 11. 85% interest. If the interest is calculated weekly, how much greater is Joels effective rate than his stated rate? a. 0. 72 percentage points b. 0. 52 percentage points c. 0. 70 percentage points d. 0. 67 percentage points. evidence of dinosaurs comes from group of answer choices igneous rocks metamorphic rocks sedimentary rocks What is the likely effect on the market for wine of a simultaneous increase in both consumer incomes and producer taxes on wine? (hint: think complex case)